@cf/meta/llama-3.1-8b-instruct vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Nex-N1
Lower price
@cf/meta/llama-3.1-8b-instruct
Faster
@cf/meta/llama-3.1-8b-instruct
Higher efficiency
@cf/meta/llama-3.1-8b-instruct
Input price
$0.00
$0.00
Output price
$0.00
$0.00
Context window
128K
128K
Throughput
171 tok/s
168 tok/s
Availability
99.5%
98.8%
Cost / task
$0.000
$0.000
Efficiency score
89
89
Estimated monthly cost by workload
Metric
-CF
QWEN3-30B-A3B-
Chat assistant
$0.00
$0.00
RAG / long context
$0.00
$0.00
Agent / tool use
$0.00
$0.00
Efficiency score: @cf/meta/llama-3.1-8b-instruct
Across price, speed and reliability, @cf/meta/llama-3.1-8b-instruct offers the stronger overall balance for most workloads — but the right pick depends on your exact mix of input, output and latency needs.
Figures are illustrative demo data, not financial advice.
Frequently asked questions
Is @cf/meta/llama-3.1-8b-instruct or Qwen3-30B-A3B-Nex-N1 cheaper?+
@cf/meta/llama-3.1-8b-instruct has the lower input price — $0.00 vs $0.00 per 1M tokens — so for most blended workloads it is the more cost-effective of the two. Figures are illustrative demo data.
Which should I choose, @cf/meta/llama-3.1-8b-instruct or Qwen3-30B-A3B-Nex-N1?+
Across price, speed and reliability, @cf/meta/llama-3.1-8b-instruct offers the stronger overall balance for most workloads — but the right pick depends on your exact mix of input, output and latency needs.