@cf/meta/llama-3.3-70b-instruct-fp8-fast vs granite-4.1-8b
Lower price
@cf/meta/llama-3.3-70b-instruct-fp8-fast
Faster
granite-4.1-8b
Higher efficiency
@cf/meta/llama-3.3-70b-instruct-fp8-fast
Input price
$0.00
$0.05
Output price
$0.00
$0.10
Context window
128K
131K
Throughput
138 tok/s
157 tok/s
Availability
97.9%
100.0%
Cost / task
$0.000
$0.000
Efficiency score
89
89
Estimated monthly cost by workload
Metric
-CF
GRANITE-4.1-8B
Chat assistant
$0.00
$27.00
RAG / long context
$0.00
$69.00
Agent / tool use
$0.00
$72.00
Efficiency score: @cf/meta/llama-3.3-70b-instruct-fp8-fast
Across price, speed and reliability, @cf/meta/llama-3.3-70b-instruct-fp8-fast offers the stronger overall balance for most workloads — but the right pick depends on your exact mix of input, output and latency needs.
Figures are illustrative demo data, not financial advice.
Frequently asked questions
Is @cf/meta/llama-3.3-70b-instruct-fp8-fast or granite-4.1-8b cheaper?+
@cf/meta/llama-3.3-70b-instruct-fp8-fast has the lower input price — $0.00 vs $0.05 per 1M tokens — so for most blended workloads it is the more cost-effective of the two. Figures are illustrative demo data.
Which should I choose, @cf/meta/llama-3.3-70b-instruct-fp8-fast or granite-4.1-8b?+
Across price, speed and reliability, @cf/meta/llama-3.3-70b-instruct-fp8-fast offers the stronger overall balance for most workloads — but the right pick depends on your exact mix of input, output and latency needs.