@cf/meta/llama-4-scout-17b-16e-instruct vs qwen3.5-flash-02-23
Lower price
@cf/meta/llama-4-scout-17b-16e-instruct
Faster
qwen3.5-flash-02-23
Higher efficiency
@cf/meta/llama-4-scout-17b-16e-instruct
Input price
$0.00
$0.07
Output price
$0.00
$0.26
Context window
10000K
1000K
Throughput
118 tok/s
155 tok/s
Availability
98.5%
100.0%
Cost / task
$0.000
$0.000
Efficiency score
96
96
Estimated monthly cost by workload
Metric
-CF
QWEN3.5-FLASH-
Chat assistant
$0.00
$52.20
RAG / long context
$0.00
$107.40
Agent / tool use
$0.00
$144.00
Efficiency score: @cf/meta/llama-4-scout-17b-16e-instruct
Across price, speed and reliability, @cf/meta/llama-4-scout-17b-16e-instruct offers the stronger overall balance for most workloads — but the right pick depends on your exact mix of input, output and latency needs.
Figures are illustrative demo data, not financial advice.
Frequently asked questions
Is @cf/meta/llama-4-scout-17b-16e-instruct or qwen3.5-flash-02-23 cheaper?+
@cf/meta/llama-4-scout-17b-16e-instruct has the lower input price — $0.00 vs $0.07 per 1M tokens — so for most blended workloads it is the more cost-effective of the two. Figures are illustrative demo data.
Which should I choose, @cf/meta/llama-4-scout-17b-16e-instruct or qwen3.5-flash-02-23?+
Across price, speed and reliability, @cf/meta/llama-4-scout-17b-16e-instruct offers the stronger overall balance for most workloads — but the right pick depends on your exact mix of input, output and latency needs.