text-embedding-3-large vs router-provider-fallback
Lower price
text-embedding-3-large
Faster
router-provider-fallback
Higher efficiency
text-embedding-3-large
Input price
$0.13
$0.85
Output price
$0.00
$3.40
Context window
8K
131K
Throughput
125 tok/s
148 tok/s
Availability
96.8%
99.1%
Cost / task
$0.000
$0.003
Efficiency score
88
88
Estimated monthly cost by workload
Metric
TEXT-EMBEDDING
ROUTER-PROVIDE
Chat assistant
$39.00
$663.00
RAG / long context
$156.00
$1,326
Agent / tool use
$93.60
$1,836
Efficiency score: text-embedding-3-large
Across price, speed and reliability, text-embedding-3-large offers the stronger overall balance for most workloads — but the right pick depends on your exact mix of input, output and latency needs.
Figures are illustrative demo data, not financial advice.
Frequently asked questions
Is text-embedding-3-large or router-provider-fallback cheaper?+
text-embedding-3-large has the lower input price — $0.13 vs $0.85 per 1M tokens — so for most blended workloads it is the more cost-effective of the two. Figures are illustrative demo data.
Which should I choose, text-embedding-3-large or router-provider-fallback?+
Across price, speed and reliability, text-embedding-3-large offers the stronger overall balance for most workloads — but the right pick depends on your exact mix of input, output and latency needs.