text-embedding-3-small vs router-provider-fallback
Lower price
text-embedding-3-small
Faster
text-embedding-3-small
Higher efficiency
text-embedding-3-small
Input price
$0.02
$0.85
Output price
$0.00
$3.40
Context window
8K
131K
Throughput
165 tok/s
148 tok/s
Availability
98.0%
99.1%
Cost / task
$0.000
$0.003
Efficiency score
88
88
Estimated monthly cost by workload
Metric
TEXT-EMBEDDING
ROUTER-PROVIDE
Chat assistant
$6.00
$663.00
RAG / long context
$24.00
$1,326
Agent / tool use
$14.40
$1,836
Efficiency score: text-embedding-3-small
Across price, speed and reliability, text-embedding-3-small offers the stronger overall balance for most workloads — but the right pick depends on your exact mix of input, output and latency needs.
Figures are illustrative demo data, not financial advice.
Frequently asked questions
Is text-embedding-3-small or router-provider-fallback cheaper?+
text-embedding-3-small has the lower input price — $0.02 vs $0.85 per 1M tokens — so for most blended workloads it is the more cost-effective of the two. Figures are illustrative demo data.
Which should I choose, text-embedding-3-small or router-provider-fallback?+
Across price, speed and reliability, text-embedding-3-small offers the stronger overall balance for most workloads — but the right pick depends on your exact mix of input, output and latency needs.