LIVE
BODYBUILDER$-1000000.00▼ 5.4%
GLM-4-LONG$0.00▼ 14.1%
GEMINI-2.0-FLA$0.30▼ 20.0%
GEMINI-2.0-FLA$0.40▼ 6.6%
-CF$0.00▼ 9.7%
DEEPSEEK-V4-FL$0.28▼ 26.3%
LLAMA-4-MAVERI$0.60▼ 11.9%
GROK-4-FAST$0.50▼ 6.0%
QWEN-PLUS$0.78▼ 0.6%
MINIMAX-M2.1$0.95▲ 2.6%
MINIMAX-M2$1.00▲ 2.9%
MINIMAX-01$1.10▲ 8.0%
GPT-4.1-MINI$1.60▼ 13.7%
GROK-4-1-FAST-$0.50▲ 8.9%
GPT-4.1-MINI-2$1.60▼ 31.8%
XAI$0.00▲ 4.5%
MINIMAX-M2.7$0.00▼ 9.9%
QWEN3.5-FLASH-$0.26▼ 31.0%
GPT-4.1-NANO$0.40▼ 13.0%
GEMINI-2.5-FLA$0.40▼ 0.8%
DEEPSEEK-AI$0.00▼ 27.0%
GROK-4.1-FAST$0.50▼ 16.4%
MINIMAX-M3$1.20▼ 6.1%
GOOGLE$1.50▼ 3.4%
AUTO$0.00▲ 9.7%
GOOGLE$0.00▼ 27.8%
MINIMAX-M2.7$1.20▼ 7.2%
GOOGLE$0.00▼ 0.6%
BODYBUILDER$-1000000.00▼ 5.4%
GLM-4-LONG$0.00▼ 14.1%
GEMINI-2.0-FLA$0.30▼ 20.0%
GEMINI-2.0-FLA$0.40▼ 6.6%
-CF$0.00▼ 9.7%
DEEPSEEK-V4-FL$0.28▼ 26.3%
LLAMA-4-MAVERI$0.60▼ 11.9%
GROK-4-FAST$0.50▼ 6.0%
QWEN-PLUS$0.78▼ 0.6%
MINIMAX-M2.1$0.95▲ 2.6%
MINIMAX-M2$1.00▲ 2.9%
MINIMAX-01$1.10▲ 8.0%
GPT-4.1-MINI$1.60▼ 13.7%
GROK-4-1-FAST-$0.50▲ 8.9%
GPT-4.1-MINI-2$1.60▼ 31.8%
XAI$0.00▲ 4.5%
MINIMAX-M2.7$0.00▼ 9.9%
QWEN3.5-FLASH-$0.26▼ 31.0%
GPT-4.1-NANO$0.40▼ 13.0%
GEMINI-2.5-FLA$0.40▼ 0.8%
DEEPSEEK-AI$0.00▼ 27.0%
GROK-4.1-FAST$0.50▼ 16.4%
MINIMAX-M3$1.20▼ 6.1%
GOOGLE$1.50▼ 3.4%
AUTO$0.00▲ 9.7%
GOOGLE$0.00▼ 27.8%
MINIMAX-M2.7$1.20▼ 7.2%
GOOGLE$0.00▼ 0.6%
USReasoningTRINITY-LARGE- Live · updated daily

trinity-large-thinking

Arcee Ai
Efficiency score
90/100
+0.3%
Input price
$0.22/ 1M tokens
Output price
$0.85/ 1M tokens
Context window
262K
Throughput
147tok/s
Availability
99.1%
Cost / task
$0.001

Arena Elo 1245Human-preference rating · LMArena (shown where the model is ranked)

Capabilities

Accepts (input)
Text
Produces (output)
Text

7-day heat trend

+0.3%

Pricing breakdown

Input price
$0.22/ 1M tokens
$0.0002 / 1K
Output price
$0.85/ 1M tokens
$0.0008 / 1K
Blended price
$0.69/ 1M tokens
$0.0007 / 1K

Typical 3:1 output-to-input mix, per 1M tokens

Estimated monthly cost by workload

Chat assistant
$168.00/ mo
1K in · 400 out · 10K req/day
RAG / long context
$340.50/ mo
8K in · 600 out · 5K req/day
Agent / tool use
$464.40/ mo
3K in · 1.5K out · 8K req/day
Estimate your cost →

Market position

  • Cheaper than 27% of tracked models
  • Faster than 48% of tracked models
  • Efficiency rank: #141 of 1105

Best suited for

Complex reasoning, analysis, planning and multi-step problem solving where answer quality matters more than raw cost.

About trinity-large-thinking

Trinity Large Thinking is a powerful open source reasoning model from the team at Arcee AI. It shows strong performance in PinchBench, agentic workloads, and reasoning tasks. Launch video: https://youtu.be/Gc82AXLa0Rg...

trinity-large-thinking is a Reasoning model from Arcee Ai (US). HotON.ai tracks it at $0.22 per 1M input tokens and $0.85 per 1M output tokens, with a 262K-token context window, ~147 tokens/sec throughput and 99.1% availability. Its composite efficiency score is 90/100 at an estimated $0.001 per successful task.

Compare trinity-large-thinking

TRINITY-LARGE- vs SEED-1.6-THINKTRINITY-LARGE- vs ERNIE-4.5-21B-TRINITY-LARGE- vs DEEPSEEK-AITRINITY-LARGE- vs -CF

Related market news

Google DeepMind Releases Gemma 4 QAT Checkpoints: Q4_0 and a New Mobile Format Cut On-Device Memory22 hours agoGoogle will pay SpaceX $920M per month for compute22 hours agoS&P 500 rejects SpaceX, also blocking entry for OpenAI and Anthropic22 hours ago

Frequently asked questions

How much does trinity-large-thinking cost per 1M tokens?+

trinity-large-thinking is tracked at $0.22 per 1M input tokens and $0.85 per 1M output tokens. A typical 3:1 output-to-input workload blends to roughly $0.69 per 1M tokens. Figures are illustrative demo data.

What is trinity-large-thinking best for?+

Complex reasoning, analysis, planning and multi-step problem solving where answer quality matters more than raw cost.

How fast is trinity-large-thinking?+

trinity-large-thinking delivers about 147 tokens/sec with 99.1% tracked availability, suitable for latency-sensitive, real-time applications.

Is trinity-large-thinking cheaper than other AI models?+

Within the HotON.ai tracked set, trinity-large-thinking is cheaper than 27% of models on input price and ranks #141 of 1105 by overall efficiency.

Related models

seed-1.6-thinking
ByteDance Seed
−13.2%
ernie-4.5-21b-a3b-thinking
Baidu Wenxin
−17.5%
deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-R1
Baseten Model APIs
−6.3%
@cf/deepseek-ai/deepseek-r1-distill-qwen-32b
Cloudflare Workers AI
−29.6%

Pricing is real (via the TestKey catalog, updated daily). Quality (Arena Elo) is real where the model is ranked on LMArena. Speed, availability and efficiency are modeled estimates.